The Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the President's 'Liberation Day' and other tariffs were not support by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on May 8th, 2025. The U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit  then ruled that the tariffs will remain in effect until the case is decided by all active sitting judges. The case is scheduled for oral argument on July 31.

Gay Pride symbols are some of the most recognized imageries. From slogans like Love is Love to emblems like the rainbow flag, Pride stands out. So, what happens when organizations and individuals try to register widely known trademarks? Well, it’s not as easy as one might think. In fact, terms or symbols that are generic in nature, widely used or culturally shared, are often not eligible for trademarking. Senior associate Anthony Wenn explains why that is in this article.

In Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services, the Supreme Court ruled that Marlean Ames was allowed to establish discrimination from her previous place of employment with the same standards of proof as those from minority groups. Before this decision, certain federal circuit courts required a higher burden when discrimination claims were brought by a member of a majority group. Chris Parker explains the recent unanimous decision by the Supreme Court on the rights of individuals subjected to reverse discrimination.