Schedule A litigation was once a quick way for sellers to sue their competition. But, with heightened scrutiny, all that is changing and rights holders must look at Schedule A litigation as a tool, rather than a short cut. With the current landscape, Schedule A litigation can still be effective for IP enforcement if done with coordinated effort and preparation.

Being sued in a Schedule A lawsuit can put online sellers and businesses into a tricky position and often leaves them with very little action to take. Historically, defendants have defaulted or settled quickly but now, that is beginning to change. Courts are increasingly demanding thoroughness from plaintiffs and allowing defendants opportunities to be heard. Those who act expeditiously with experienced counsel and challenge weak procedural foundations can often reduce or even eliminate severe consequences.

In mid-2025, the Northern District of Illinois saw a hiccup in the procedures of Schedule A litigation. A stay was placed on all cases which created immediate and lasting impact for rights holders. As of right now the stay is still in effect and while it’s still possible to utilize Schedule A litigation, firms that are positioned to litigate contested cases are best positioned to guide clients through the next phase of online Intellectual Property enforcement.

Golan Christie Taglia is proud to announce the promotion of three outstanding attorneys to the position of Senior Associate: Bradley S. Lohsl, Shelby H. Nikoloff, and Toni F. Esparza.